BioMed Central Blog

Tuesday Jun 22, 2010
New and improved Impact Factors for BioMed Central journals in 2009 Journal Citation Report
The newly released 2009 edition of Thomson Reuters' Journal Citation Report includes official Impact Factors for 77 BioMed Central journals, 54 of which are new or improved.
Some highlights:
- Genome Biology (IF 6.63) increased its Impact Factor and remains BioMed Central's most highly cited journal.
- BMC Biology (IF 5.64) is now ranked #4 of 73 in the BIOLOGY category.
- BMC Medicine (IF 3.99) climbs to #18 of 132 in MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL.
- Five more medical journals in the BMC series received their first Impact
Factors:
- BMC Family Practice (IF 1.71)
- BMC Medical Genomics (IF 2.66)
- BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (IF 1.90)
- BMC Medical Research Methodology (IF 2.3)
- BMC Psychiatry (IF 1.83)
- BMC Plant Biology (IF 3.77) remains in the top 10% of the PLANT SCIENCES category, while Plant Methods (IF 2.98) joins the category in the top 15%.
- Biotechnology for Biofuels (IF 4.12) received an impressive first Impact Factor.
- Breast Cancer Research (IF 5.33) has overtaken its closed-access rival to become the highest ranked breast cancer journal.
- Malaria Journal increased its Impact Factor to 3.00, maintaining its position at #2 in the TROPICAL MEDICINE category.
- Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases (IF 5.84) experienced a significant gain, taking it to #7 of 92 in the MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL category.
- Parasites & Vectors (IF 2.05) made its debut in the JCR, ranked #11 of 28 in the PARASITOLOGY category.
- Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica (IF 1.00) saw an increased Impact Factor for the 3rd successive year.
- Journal of Neuroinflammation (IF 4.68) and Molecular Neurodegeneration (IF 5.09) both appeared in the top 20% of titles in the NEUROSCIENCES category.
Full Impact Factor listing (new or increased Impact Factors are shown in bold)
Posted by Matthew Cockerill at 10:02 Comments (4)




Can you send me an analysis of how your unofficial impact factors compared with the new official impact factors for the 17 journals that just got official impact factors?
Posted by Bruce Rosen on June 24, 2010 at 11:57 AM BST #
Dear Sir:
First of all, congratulations to BioMedCentral for these news and to the editors of the Journals that improved its impact factor as well as the journals that obtain it for the first time.
I would like to know why Cerebrospinal Fluid Research has no an official impact factor.
Ishould be glad to receive the answer at my email: adorta@infomed.sld.cu
Many thanks and best regards,
Dr. Alberto J Dorta-Contreras
Posted by Dr. Alberto J Dorta-Contreras on June 24, 2010 at 09:02 PM BST #
Please let me know the IF of cancer cell international according to 2009 release
Posted by Saravana Kumar on July 04, 2010 at 12:02 PM BST #
Since several years I wonder why
BMC Geriatrics has not yet got an
impact factor. (I already published
three times in that journal).
What and where are the difficulties.
Best regards
eva
Posted by mann eva on August 05, 2010 at 02:52 PM BST #